-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Haible wrote: > I have nothing against providing a portable API with a Unix > implementation, and the Woe32 implementation comes later. But I > refuse an API which is a priori known to be unimplementable on > Woe32 (other than with Cygwin).
Still, it is useful to have a portable way to accomplish the task across Unices. Why hobble the Unix implementations because Windows can't perform the task, if it is well documented for Windows users that it is broken? Regards, Derek - -- Derek R. Price CVS Solutions Architect Get CVS support at Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com>! v: +1 248.835.1260 f: +1 248.835.1263 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEWFeGLD1OTBfyMaQRAjURAKC9jEHO5Q9sfOTZzXNh9878UOw7PgCfVVyZ o6v5k3aes7LnOzxZFtpcdqk= =barW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
