For GNU licenses, it might be simpler if the --version output merely
referred to <http://gnu.org/licenses>,
Ok, I can buy that. So my sense is that what we want to propose to rms
is this:
hello (GNU hello) 2.1.90
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License: GNU GPL v2+ (see http://gnu.org/licenses)
This is free software. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Along with the assorted other abbreviations for the license-list.html
licenses you mentioned.
How does that look?
Thanks,
Karl