the title "Copying" of gpl.texi makes no sense I agree, but I don't think we should change the node name in the canonical gpl.texi. So many manuals already use "Copying".
The other title "Library Copying" is nonsense as well, since
RMS doesn't recomment the LGPL for libraries.
Good point. And the LGPL is far less used, so changing that node name
seems more plausible.
If someone will send me the combined patches, I'll ask rms. (Or, of
course, feel free to send to rms directly.)
k
