Simon Josefsson wrote:
> However, it seems arguable correct (right?), so I propose to install
> the patch below in gnulib-tool. Ok?
>
> /Simon
>
> --- gnulib-tool 12 Sep 2006 17:37:41 +0200 1.159
> +++ gnulib-tool 13 Sep 2006 15:50:00 +0200
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@
> fi
> echo
> echo "${libname}_${libext}_SOURCES ="
> - echo "${libname}_${libext}_LIBADD = @${perhapsLT}LIBOBJS@"
> + echo "${libname}_${libext}_LIBADD = \$(${perhapsLT}LIBOBJS)"
> if test "$libtool" = true; then
> echo "${libname}_${libext}_LDFLAGS = \$(AM_LDFLAGS)"
> fi
>
OK. I installed it for you, with a comment.
Bruno
2009-09-13 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnulib-tool (func_emit_lib_Makefile_am): Use $(LIBOBJS), not
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Suggested by Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
*** gnulib-tool 9 Sep 2006 19:02:08 -0000 1.159
--- gnulib-tool 13 Sep 2006 15:00:19 -0000
***************
*** 1098,1104 ****
fi
echo
echo "${libname}_${libext}_SOURCES ="
! echo "${libname}_${libext}_LIBADD = @${perhapsLT}LIBOBJS@"
if test "$libtool" = true; then
echo "${libname}_${libext}_LDFLAGS = \$(AM_LDFLAGS)"
fi
--- 1098,1106 ----
fi
echo
echo "${libname}_${libext}_SOURCES ="
! # Here we use $(LIBOBJS), not @[EMAIL PROTECTED] The value is the same.
However,
! # automake during its analyses looks for $(LIBOBJS), not for @[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
! echo "${libname}_${libext}_LIBADD = \$(${perhapsLT}LIBOBJS)"
if test "$libtool" = true; then
echo "${libname}_${libext}_LDFLAGS = \$(AM_LDFLAGS)"
fi
