On 6/19/06, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe so. In findutils I ended up working around the problem by
> defining a FINDLIB_REPLACE_FUNCS defun which populates @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In other words I used essentially the same idea but with different
> macro and variable names.
Couldn't we do something similar in gnulib? E.g., use
GNULIB_REPLACE_FUNCS instead? Then AC_REPLACE_FUNCS in people's
package will continue to work.
That seems fairly reasonable, albeit a bit of an upheaval for everyone.
James.
