Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> s/ is //
Done, thanks.
> BTW, was there some convention whether to write directory names with a
> trailing slash? It looks a bit unnatural to me in normal text.
It makes clear that the text is talking about a directory. (*)
> Hmm, standards.texi seems silent about this issue.
Yes, matters of style and personal preference cannot be standardized.
> > + @quotation
> > + Copyright @copyright{} 2002-2007 Free Software Foundation, [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]
>
> The minimum copyright year surely would have to be adjusted.
For the documentation purpose here, I think this is not relevant. But you
can also write 200X-200Y if you prefer that.
> > + @quotation
> > + Copyright @copyright{} 2002-2007 Free Software Foundation, [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]
> > + Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> > + under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
>
> Shouldn't that be 1.2 at least?
Is GFDL 1.1 with no invariant sections accepted by Debian?
Is GFDL 1.2 with no invariant sections accepted by Debian?
Bruno
(*) It's also to tease those Windows users...
