"Sergey Poznyakoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
>
>> It seems more likely that there should be a new file named
>> modules/include_next. If you create it as follows, at least
>> coreutils builds once again:
>
> Yes, that's what I did to bootstrap tar and cpio. Nevertheless, the
> following lines in ChangeLog:
>
> * modules/fcntl (Depends-on): Depend on absolute-header, not
> include_next.
> * modules/float: Likewise.
> * modules/inttypes: Likewise.
> ...
>
> make me doubt whether this was the right solution.
That ChangeLog entry should be reversed.
It can only make sense this way:
* modules/fcntl (Depends-on): Depend on include_next, not
absolute-header include_next.
since there has never been an include_next module, and until
that change, fcntl *did* depend on absolute-header.
