is necessary to s/unnumbered/appendixsec/ if including the GPLv3 in an
Yeah, the discrepancy between the FDL and the GPL seems like a bug.
I'll ask about that change.
or if texinfo could support some other subsectioning keyword that
works regardless of whether the parent is a main body section or an
appendix).
It does, and has for many years. @section/@subsection/etc. work in any
kind of chapter-level unit. (There is also @raisesections and
@lowersections for when an included file is at the "wrong level".)
I'll suggest using @section in gpl-3.0.texi. Ditto lgpl-3.0.texi (still
not in existence).
Also, gpl-2.0.texi adds a @cindex entry, but gpl-3.0.texi lacks it. That
means the manual's index is one entry shorter by upgrading to the new
license; I'm wondering if that was intentional.
I don't know if it's intentional, but the lack of an index entry seems
like a good thing to me, so I don't plan to ask about it :). Any
desired index entries are better added in the including document, seems
to me.
Best,
Karl
