Hello again, I'm sorry that I was too quick writing my previous mail. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:34:54AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > But my GNU libc.info mentiones st_atimensec, but not st_atim. > > So it seems that platforms using GNU libc (GNU/Linux, Cygwin?) are > converging towards POSIX.
I was wrong here. st_atim seems to be the prefferred one, in current
GNU libc and POSIX draft. So the only problem is that libc.info is
obsolete, I'm going to report that.
Sorry,
Stepan
