Eric Blake wrote:
> found that it would somewhat easier if I could learn accurate
> signal information even when a signal is blocked. Is this okay to apply?
Yes, of course. Thank you. From me, only a small comment update.
2008-06-22 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/sigprocmask.c: Update a comment.
--- lib/sigprocmask.c.orig 2008-06-22 21:06:14.000000000 +0200
+++ lib/sigprocmask.c 2008-06-22 21:05:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -188,7 +188,8 @@
{
if (signal (sig, old_handlers[sig]) != blocked_handler)
/* The application changed a signal handler while the signal
- was blocked. We don't support this. */
+ was blocked, bypassing our rpl_signal replacement.
+ We don't support this. */
abort ();
received[sig] = pending_array[sig];
blocked_set &= ~(1U << sig);
@@ -230,7 +231,8 @@
old_handlers[sig] = handler;
return result;
}
- return signal (sig, handler);
+ else
+ return signal (sig, handler);
}
else
{
