Eric Blake wrote: ... > It looks like the problems with glibc memchr on x86_64 are > present in glibc 2.10, but fixed in git: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 > > But as there are systems in the wild with the broken implementation, we > should probably start worrying about replacing the buggy memchr > implementations.
Definitely.
