Bruno Haible wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: >> > Here's a proposed patch. >> >> That looks good as far as it goes, > > OK, here's a revised patch. Avoids the #ifndef now, and includes some > tests/*.c > files. > >> but while we're at it, >> shouldn't we use a consistent naming convention? >> It's confusing that one .h file uses _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN and >> another uses ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN, for the same notion. > > Good point. Here's a patch to rename these macros, so that they use the > _GL_ prefix which we agreed a couple of months ago is the least risky. > > Objections to these patches? Jim? Paul? ... > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Don't interfere with a program's definition of > __attribute__. > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Consistent macro naming for macros that use GCC > __attribute__.
Fine by me. I'll test once you push. Thanks!
