On 01/14/2012 08:27 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: >> Oh well, it was a bit of a stab in the dark anyway. >> > I guess we'll have to do Eric's suggestion to wrap opendir >> > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10305#68>. >> > That should work around the problem, and in some sense it's nicer anyway >> > because it causes dirfd to work in the usual way (as required in the next >> > POSIX). > Any progress on this?
Not be me, alas. Is it something you can work on?
