On 05/28/2012 09:26 PM, Steven M. Schweda wrote: > any environment-specific code really needs to be tested in > the specific environment
Sure, that's important, but it's also important to minimize the number of problems that can slip through and be caught only by testing. Our tests are not exhaustive, and can't be expected to be. For properties where portable compile-time checks are easy to do (as they are here), there's a good argument for doing them. > And it's impossible/impractical to arrange this > commonality using #define (et al.)? I'm sure one can do it with #if and #define as well, but the result won't be appreciably simpler than the "if (...)" version. And why bother? The "if (...)" version has the advantage of more-portable compile-time checking.
