On 8 June 2012 11:19, Pedro Alves <pal...@redhat.com> wrote: > I've heard such rants as well. The rants are IMO, misdirected. For instance, > IIRC, gnulib's freadahead use is caused by musl's printf not being posix > compliant, causing gnulib to pull in its printf replacement, which doesn't > work > on musl. A library that is new, actively maintained, and that calls itself > a "C/POSIX standard library" should really address that by making it's printf > posix compliant, so that gnulib's fallback doesn't even get built. It seems > that > nobody who is interested in musl has looked at gnulib's config.log to > understand > why does gnulib think musl's printf is not good enough.
Thanks; I'll report that to the musl development list. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
