Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 09/04/2012 12:21 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> While investigating the rm-vs-slash-decorated-symlink-to-dir problem, >> I noticed this: >> >> From 9322cc5db3a6efe4c19f274512a28767872384e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> >> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:31:09 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not >> memmove >> >> * lib/fts.c (fts_alloc): Fix unjustified memcopy: s/memmove/memcpy/ >> > Shouldn't it read "Fix unjustified memmove"?
Yes, thanks.