Stefano Lattarini wrote:

> On 09/04/2012 12:21 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> While investigating the rm-vs-slash-decorated-symlink-to-dir problem,
>> I noticed this:
>>
>> From 9322cc5db3a6efe4c19f274512a28767872384e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:31:09 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not
>>  memmove
>>
>> * lib/fts.c (fts_alloc): Fix unjustified memcopy: s/memmove/memcpy/
>>
> Shouldn't it read "Fix unjustified memmove"?

Yes, thanks.

Reply via email to