On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote:
>> Any update on that? Do you plan to include it? > I went to deal with the mechanics of adding it and noticed a few details. > What do you think about hash_pjw_no_mod or hash_pjw_bare > as the function name? They convey more meaning than the "_s" suffix. > Also, please make it look like other new-module commits. > I.e., > - list the module name in MODULES.html.sh > - make the first line of the commit log be "new-module-name: new module" > - add a ChangeLog entry The new patch should handle those. regards, Nikos
0001-hash-pjw-bare-new-module.patch
Description: Binary data
