Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:52:06PM +0000, James Youngman wrote: >> Did anybody do any further work on whether it worked best to fix this >> in gnulib or in findutils? > > As I said, my proposal is to introduce a new FTS_ flag that would make > fts_open behave as before that change, and use this flag in findutils. > I haven't heard yet neither from Jim nor from other gnulib people whether > it is acceptable or there is a better way to fix the problem.
Hi Dmitry, Sorry about the delay. That sounds like a fine approach. It's nice that few (if any) other callers would have to change.
