Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:52:06PM +0000, James Youngman wrote:
>> Did anybody do any further work on whether it worked best to fix this
>> in gnulib or in findutils?
>
> As I said, my proposal is to introduce a new FTS_ flag that would make
> fts_open behave as before that change, and use this flag in findutils.
> I haven't heard yet neither from Jim nor from other gnulib people whether
> it is acceptable or there is a better way to fix the problem.

Hi Dmitry,

Sorry about the delay.  That sounds like a fine approach.
It's nice that few (if any) other callers would have to change.

Reply via email to