On 12/12/2013 05:44 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > But while we're on the subject, shouldn't > it be 'gl-openssh.h', not 'gl_openssh.h'?
I was just being consistent with other lib/gl_*.h There are no lib/gl-*
On 12/12/2013 05:44 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > But while we're on the subject, shouldn't > it be 'gl-openssh.h', not 'gl_openssh.h'?
I was just being consistent with other lib/gl_*.h There are no lib/gl-*