On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > Ben Walton wrote: >> >> WIth your suggested followup >> (prerequisite), I think that it's a better solution. > > > Better yet, how about putting the goto-containing code into a subsdiary > static function that can return rather than goto? That'd be cleaner anyway.
I had considered this, but it didn't feel like the right choice to me. With a new _GL_UNUSED_LABEL, which is cleaner than my patch, I'm less inclined. That said, if you folks feel it's the way to go, I will write the patch to meet your ideals which are more important. :) Thanks -Ben -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take the risk of thinking for yourself. Much more happiness, truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way. -Christopher Hitchens ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
