On 5/11/22 04:18, Bruno Haible wrote:
Reuben Thomas wrote:I'm happy to prepare a patch in this case. I would simply remove all mention of syntax tables, as that functionality is no longer available.Attached.Thanks! Looks good to me, except that the comma in line 111 is superfluous. Paul, OK with you as well?
Only thing I spotted offhand was that \s and \S mean something entirely different in glibc as syntax classes are not programmable.
