On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 14:05, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > Hi Reuben, > > Reuben Thomas wrote: > > The perl module has a GPL license, but its only file, m4/perl.m4, has an > > "unlimited" license. > > The license of a module, in the module description, cannot be "wrong" since > that's the authoritative location where the license is noted. >
Thanks for fixing this! In this case, it doesn't make sense to me that a module whose module file is trivial and whose only contents is a file with an "unlimited" license doesn't have the same license. In general, I'd expect modules to have something like the strictest license of any of their dependencies.
