Hi Paul, On 5/20/24 9:13 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > Gnulib does not support glibc 2.1.x and older, so this should not be a > problem when porting to glibc. However, I worried that other platforms might > have the bug, until I noticed that m4/byteswap.m4 already inadvertently tests > for it. I installed the attached patch to document the test.
I was worried about other systems too. After you mentioned that macros don't work on double arguments correctly I used it in byteswap.m4 since it seemed like a nice compile-time check. I probably should have commented it though, thanks. > We can ignore this Coverity defect report as a false positive, just as we > ignore many other defect reports. Interesting. I just learned what a Coverity scan is. Do I have to have permission to view the defects? Collin
