Re: [PATCH] attribute: const/pure defaults to unsequenced/reproducible

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> N2956 has a typo. In this statement:
> 
> "Similarly, GCC’s pure is less restricted than the new standard 
> attribute [[reproducible]], and an implementation of the GCC feature is, 
> syntax aside, an implementation of the new standard attribute."
> 
> The words "less restricted" should be "stricter"

Thanks for explaining. I see.