Paul Eggert wrote: > > After the Solaris crash fix, the nstrftime tests still fail, due to this > > output: > > > > <-00>0: expected "1970-01-01 00:00:00 -0000 (-00)", got "1970-01-01 > > 00:00:00 +0000 (-00)" > > <-00>0: expected "1985-11-05 00:53:21 -0000 (-00)", got "1985-11-05 > > 00:53:21 +0000 (-00)" > > <-00>0: expected "2001-09-09 01:46:42 -0000 (-00)", got "2001-09-09 > > 01:46:42 +0000 (-00)" > > > > Can you please look into that? I cannot judge whether -0000 and +0000 > > should be treated as equivalent or not. > > "-0000" signals "I don't know what the time zone is, so I'm using UTC".
Thanks. This is not documented in POSIX [1] nor in the man-pages [2]. Would it make sense that I suggest it to be documented in the man-pages? Bruno [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/strftime_l.html [2] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/strftime.3.html
