On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, enh wrote:
>not when POSIX screwed up and made a change that made most of the
>existing implementations non-conformant, no. that sounds like a POSIX
“most of”?
Looks to me like most implementations already do the latter,
and some might do the former, and only a minority (the three
mentioned earlier) don’t.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
