On Thursday, 19 February 2026 17:52:23 CET Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 19/02/2026 14:16, Bruno Haible wrote: > > Jim Meyering wrote: > >>> I've worked on it and it's OK with me to relicense to LGPLv2, which is > >>> what glibc needs. > >> > >> > >> It's fine to relicense my parts to LGPLv2. > > > > Thanks, Paul and Jim. With this, we can change the license of the modules > > 'dev-ino' and 'cycle-check' (done below). > > > > For module 'fts', in particular lib/fts.c, we also need the agreements of > > - myself, for commit 6edf6dbacf1e136539da03115adee858ec8a3d33, > > - Pádraig Brady, for commits > > 49078a780041205fbbab56802033595eb44f854d > > 6835fc458f30b94f15d69c35a79cbc2dfabe2d06, > > - Kamil Dudka, for commit > > ac67780e88411e8fcb94cda0a9e0a9abab6f8369. > > Other commits are below the "not copyrightable" threshold. > > > > I hereby give my permission to relicense my contributions to this file > > under LGPLv2+. > > > > What about you, Pádraig and Kamil? > > I hereby give my permission to relicense my contributions to this file > under LGPLv2+. > > thanks, > Padraig
Sure thing! I hereby give my permission to relicense my contributions to this file under LGPLv2+. Kamil
