Hi Jim, > > - Who did make the edits to the source code files? Was that you > > (with Emacs, I guess), or was it some "agent"? > > I did. yes, with Emacs.
Good. > > - What was the LLM's output that you made use of? Just a textual > > description of what to do? Or some code snippet? > > I explicitly requested no code. Good. Nice idea. Probably even a "best practice", I would say. > > - Do you still have a transcript of the LLM's output, that you can > > show? > ... > It said something like this: > The fix is to save the original state_log before pruning, then loop: > on set_regs failure, find the next shorter halt state, restore and > re-prune from the saved copy, and retry set_regs. Good. I think from the point of view of copyright law, you are the author of that change, and thanks to your copyright assignment, the FSF now can distribute this without legal risk. Anyone disagrees? Then, let's hope that the glibc people evaluate the legal risk in the same way and don't reject the patch... Bruno
