Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks. I don't think GCC complains about this, right?
Oh, I missed this part of your message: >> These correspond to an UBSAN category that is implemented by clang, >> but not yet by GCC (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112284 >> ). I still don't see an issue with it even though it is undefined behavior, but perhaps I just haven't looked into it enough... Collin
