On 9/18/26 08:07, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Do we need an explicit check for the issue to enable the replacement?
Looks like it, yes. (We should also fix glibc of course....)
- Re: -Wus... Paul Eggert
- Re: qual... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- Gnulib s... Paul Eggert
- Re: Gnul... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- Re: -Wus... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- Re: -Wus... Paul Eggert
- Re: -Wus... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- Re: [PAT... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- Re: [PAT... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PAT... Pádraig Brady
- Re: [PAT... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PAT... Pádraig Brady
- Re: uchar.h C++ t... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- [PATCH 2/8] localeinfo: use counto... Paul Eggert
- [PATCH 4/8] wchar-h: doc wchar_t l... Paul Eggert
- [PATCH 6/8] localeinfo: don’t chec... Paul Eggert
- [PATCH 7/8] localeinfo: port to si... Paul Eggert
- [PATCH 5/8] localeinfo: add U+1C80... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH 1/8] localeinfo: new mo... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
- Re: [PATCH 1/8] localeinfo: n... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH 1/8] localeinf... Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list
