On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:17:49AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:58:24 +0100, "H. Langos" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > why not gnupod_find? it uses regex on strings and numeric matching on
> > numeric attributes when using the = comparator.
> 
> Because I still need to get used to these commands. ;-) Good point though,
> I should stop using gnupod_search.

I am working on replacing gnupod_search with three dedicated programs.
gnupod_find and gnupod_delete are already working well, though there are
still some features missing, like script-friendly output and artwork
extraction.

What's still completely missing is gnupod_modify but I hope I'll get there. 
I've cloned the git repository and as long as I have electricity at least
occasionally I will only need time... Good thing about the heat here in
brazil is that the kids get tired early :-)

cheers
-henrik



_______________________________________________
Bug-gnupod mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupod

Reply via email to