Fred Kiefer wrote:
Alexander Malmberg wrote:[snip]
I suppose you could see the headers, which do specify the integer values, as implicit documentation, but GNUstep doesn't have a "the header is the documentation"-tradition.
This is a very strange statement, I already did reply to a previous mail from Kazu, that I don't have access to any Apple header files. Up to now I thought, that my writen word for not using any Apple headers should be enough.
This sounds like a misunderstanding. I wasn't talking about apple's headers, I was talking about GNUstep's headers, and what exactly we consider part of our public API, and thus what we need to do to make sure that the integer values of the constants are a part of our public API.
Ok, now I see the other way your sentence could be read and was surely meant to be understood. Sorry for reading this different.
As for the technical issue, what you wanted to document, as stated in one of your previous mails, is fully suffient.
There is one thing, that I really don't understand, which is why the Apple documentation make a big difference between -abortModal and all the -stopModalWithCode: calls. There must be a bit more to this.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
