Adam Fedor wrote:
I think I remember looking at it and it looked OK. But I think I wanted
someone like Richard to look at it. Jeremy has an assignment on file,
so it is OK to put in from that standpoint.
Richard, have you ever looked at this?
On May 21, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
Did this patch ever get reviewed/applied?
Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
Good morning;
I've recently written a patch against NSHost to make it IPv6 aware,
and am curious to hear some of your thoughts about it.
I've tried to keep from adding any new methods (though I did add one
to the "Private" category as you can see in the patch); and verified
no breakage here with IPv4 addressing, and IPv6 addressing appears
to be working fine (again here, using KAME version 20010528/FreeBSD).
Any suggestions, critisims are welcome.
Thanks.
-Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
