Follow-up Comment #4, bug #36706 (project gnustep): David or Nicola, coudl one of you please look into this problem? My feeling is that the implementation in all our libobjc implementations are wrong. I would think that if a method is not directly implemented, class_getMethodImplementation should return a function that calls __objc_msg_forward2() and then calls the result. That way __objc_msg_forward2() would be called with the correct object as first parameter and not as it is now with nil as first argument.
What makes me doubt my analysis is that all the different libobjc implementations do it the same way. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36706> _______________________________________________ Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list Bug-gnustep@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep