Follow-up Comment #4, bug #36706 (project gnustep):
David or Nicola,
coudl one of you please look into this problem? My feeling is that the
implementation in all our libobjc implementations are wrong. I would think
that if a method is not directly implemented, class_getMethodImplementation
should return a function that calls __objc_msg_forward2() and then calls the
result. That way __objc_msg_forward2() would be called with the correct object
as first parameter and not as it is now with nil as first argument.
What makes me doubt my analysis is that all the different libobjc
implementations do it the same way.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36706>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
