On 7 Jan 2014, at 12:33, Markus Hitter <[email protected]> wrote: >> That would appear to be a different issue. >> This issue was titled 'make documentation is un-installable' > > Now with being clear the issue actually exists
> and the confusion is more > a matter of the titles' wording, would you please re-open this bug? Sorry if it offends, but if there's a different issue, we should address it separately rather than re-opening (trying to graft one issue onto another invalid one would only cause confusion), as we'd probably need to re-title, change the category to be a change request, change the problem description etc. When you say it's 'clear the issue actually exists'... What issue? I might guess that the issue you mean is that you want to be able to more easily install the gnustep-make documentation without installing gnustep-make? If so, perhaps a patch and/or change request to do that would be more appropriate? but where would you install it and why (if you don't have a gnustep environment set up, then you really don't have an install location)? Perhaps I might guess that you mean, as Sebastian suggested, that you want documentation to be built and installed along with gnustep-make ... if so, that's not a (reasonable IMO) change request ... but since what you are asking for is a change to overall policy rather than a specific package, probably the mailing list makes more sense. To be honest though, it looks like you just jumped in at the end of the quick-start section in the INSTALL document and are now unhappy because running the last bit of the quick-start process without the earlier parts of the process didn't do what you expected. In which case: a. you aren't likely to do the same thing again and b. hopefully my changes in trunk will stop anyone else from making the same mistake. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
