Follow-up Comment #2, bug #47926 (project gnustep):
You have a good point, which I did consider. In my applications I don't use
setQueuePriority:, so the fix I proposed is sufficient for me. You're right
that it would be better to observe the queuePriority and re-sort the queue if
it changes.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47926>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
