Quoth Reed Loden: > On Aug 3, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Nick White wrote: > >> Gentoo separates the xulrunner and browser components into separate >> packages (both from the firefox source tarball). I intend to do the >> same from the icecat tarball, but I'm wondering what I should name >> the xulrunner component. I was thinking just "xulrunner-libre", but >> if anyone has any other ideas or thinks a more 'icecat' themed name >> would be appropriate, please share your thoughts. > > What would the differences be between normal xulrunner and xulrunner-libre? > Seems like you could just use the same xulrunner packages and just build > icecat on top of it.
Actually, you seem to be right. I assumed that there was more that icecat removed, but comparing the remove.nonfree script to the files from a vanilla xulrunner install, it seems that it's all free software there. So I'll just keep using the vanilla xulrunner as a base. Thanks, Nick -- GPG : 0x04E4653F 9732D7C7A441D79EFDF094F61F48567404E4653F
pgphsBoTTTOFB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
