Hi, Thank you, wasn't aware, never used Debian. But wasn't the idea of ~/.mozilla linked to the infrastructure (profiles, browser headers) rather than the trademark?
-- -Dan Q On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:58:19 +0200, David Hedlund <[email protected]> wrote: > Tiberiu makes sense;The /Debian/ Free Software /Guidelines/ (DFSG) decided to > put Icedove in ~/.icedove > > > On 2016-06-15 18:54, Daniel Quintiliani wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think it's a better idea to keep all the Mozilla-based products' profiles > > in the same predictable place. Thunderbird, Tor Browser Bundle, etc. > > > > BTW, any new info on the v45 security issues vs the cookie prompt? Were we > > going to backport the security updates to v38, or move forward to v45 like > > TBB has, possibly including one of the add-ons Mozilla recommended? > > > > Personally I can't imagine using a cookie prompt for each site (plus every > > banner ad and invisible GIF?) and always found it better to clean cookies > > on shutdown, and have done so pretty much all my life. I wouldn't mind > > sacrificing such a feature in exchange for fixing security issues now and > > more easily in the future. > > > > -- > > > > -Dan Q > > > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:07:34 +0300, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm impressed with the new GNU IceCat maintained by Ruben. > >> > >> However, I would love to see the profiles stored under .gnuzilla/icecat/ > >> instead of the current path .mozilla/icecat/. > >> > >> Is there a technical reason why this shouldn't be possible? I'm thinking > >> maybe backward compatibility? > >> > >> Please let me know. > >> Tiberiu > >> > >> -- > >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > > > -- > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
