Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right? --
-Dan Q On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have > IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable. > Any freedom and security enhancement they ask for, it's to GNU/Linux > direction. > > > El 29/12/16 a les 23:58, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit: > > I think there's been a real problem lately where complaints by users are > > being confused with official project decisions. Like when v45.5 and v45.3 > > were released Linux only, some of us asked if a Windows version would be > > available, and it turned into arguments about whether we should expand > > non-DRM browsers under unfree systems. Instead of arguments we need to > > focus on the project and official policy vs mailing list opinions. We > > should also focus on who the decision makers actually are, to my knowledge > > Ruben has been busy lately but someone can easily say "Why should we > > maintain a Windows or Mac version of IceCat?" and be confused for someone > > who is making decisions for the project. > > > > -- > > > > -Dan Q > > > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:03:32 -0800, Gary Driggs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Daniel Quintiliani wrote: > >>> > >>> Ruben having discontinued Windows support for IceCat was the best and > >>> easiest way to force most of the human population into DRM. > >> > >> Where did you see any such announcement? > >> > >> Maybe we should start an alternate mailing list, > >> [email protected], so the rest of us can discuss technical topics > >> in peace. > >> -- > >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > > > > > -- > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
