So you would recommend most of the planet use Microsoft Edge then? --
-Dan Q On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:58:25 +0100 (CET), <[email protected]> wrote: > I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more secure > browser like icecate on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET > surveillance, freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those of > apple and microsoft. why? because there is no benefit. the levels of > disrespect that apple and microsoft have for user privacy (remember, they are > a part of the nsa spying cult known as PRISM) are so high that there is no > doubt in my opinion that any possible benefit to using icecat is instantly > reduced to nothing while using it on windows or mac. > > Using icecat on windows or mac is like bringing a bucket of fresh water with > you everywhere you go because it has the salt removed and is more secure > against salt, and then going to the middle of the ocean and expecting your > freshwater to not get salty. I honestly believe that everyone who suggests > more hard work for those involved with icecat to make it function on windows > or mac are some kind of weirdos with hidden intentions. > > 14. Mar 2017 02:13 by [email protected]: > > > > "Daniel Quintiliani" <> [email protected]> > writes: > >> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as > >> libre browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :( > > > > Please, let's not propose adding more work for Rubén. Given that he's > > already too overloaded to produce IceCat releases in a timely fashion, > > and given the paramount importance of reducing the latency of IceCat > > security updates, I fully support his decision to reduce the amount of > > work associated with each release. Let someone else volunteer to build > > binaries for Windows and Mac, if there's sufficient interest. > > > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > -- > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
