Hello, I am the one who reported the issue to Mr. McMahon. I didn't write here because I thought it isn't a GNU IceCat issue, rather it is FSF's Jitsi instance issue. Sorry about the inconvenience.
Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > However, it would also be good to understand why there seems to be at > least one IceCat 102 build out there that sends a different user-agent > string than the one sent by the IceCat 102 built by GNU Guix. In the beginning, I thought it is related to the browser's user-agent string. Because I installed `User-Agent Switcher and Manager' add-on and then I could access the `jitsi.member.fsf.org' website. After that, I noticed that useragent string doesn't include "IceCat" as you said. I started to spoof Navigator API with CanvasBlocker add-on, which helped me to bypass the issue. I didn't want to mess with IceCat's defaults in the first place but disabling privacy.resistFingerprinting seems to work with Jitsi. Ironically, it seems like enabling fingerprinting makes my browser more recognizable, if I understood correctly. Thank you for maintaining this browser both for installation scripts and Guix package definition. Also, this is the first time I'm writing to a mailing list with Gnus, so please let me know if I didn't follow some conventions.
