On 03/13/2010 09:45 PM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> One solution to make this patch palatable to gawk would be to add > more "feature bits" to dfasyntax, that specify whether dfaexec can > make some assumptions about the input.I think this is the way to go. It sounds reasonable to me. I don't mind adding in a few more bits.
I fixed it in the next version; for now it's #ifn?def GREP instead of an additional bit.
Paolo
