Hi. > From: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:11:32 +0200 > Subject: Re: Dealing with character ranges in grep > To: Aharon Robbins <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > > > ? In principle, I'm all for this, but in practice, I'm going to leave gawk's > > ? code alone for now (there's always 4.1 :-). > > As long as --posix is not affecting the choice, that's fine. However, > please make sure that compiling gawk --without-included-regex works > (it should go without saying)!
I was wrong. Gawk doesn't have --with[out]-included-regex. Maybe at one point it did, but no longer. > But we do have control over gnulib, and the current choice there > already doesn't match glibc's (strcoll-order doesn't always match > glibc's collation equivalent ordering), so there's good reason to > switch at least gnulib. Makes sense. It'd be nice to see some convergence amongst the three different regexes, but I don't have the energy to tackle this. Thanks, Arnold
