Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/04/2011 03:46 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> I added the assertion to show that we can omit the "t" parameter. > > Hmm, what about doing this for MALLOC/CALLOC/REALLOC too then?
Yes, that is a worthwhile simplification.
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/04/2011 03:46 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> I added the assertion to show that we can omit the "t" parameter. > > Hmm, what about doing this for MALLOC/CALLOC/REALLOC too then?
Yes, that is a worthwhile simplification.