On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote:
> I merged that patch into the grep trunk and am closing this bug report.
> While merging, I removed one part of the patch that had a small but
> measurable performance degradation, namely, the introduction of struct
> dfatab.  I found some other minor simplifications and threw them in. There
> seems to be no significant change in CPU performance.  The patch's causes
> the dfa module's text size to shrink by 8% on my platform (x86-64 Fedora
> 20), which I suppose is a small win, but the main point of the patch is
> simplifying the source.  I'm attaching what I installed, broken into 12
> little patches to ease review.

Running the tests with ASAN-enabled grep exposed a buffer overrun
that was introduced by the "simplify range char allocation" one.
I've fixed it with the attached patch:
From 9ee100985c55da7d2568b06492ed3bee025b2bb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:03:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] grep: fix new heap write buffer overrun

* src/dfa.c (parse_bracket_exp): Fix off-by-one allocation error.
Exposed by running the tests with an ASAN-enabled binary (i.e.,
created using gcc's -fsanitize=address option). Here's the stack
trace you get with each abort:

==74010==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address\
 0x60200000c898 at pc 0x106e2cbe9 bp 0x7fff58ddec40 sp 0x7fff58ddec38
WRITE of size 4 at 0x60200000c898 thread T0
    #0 0x106e2cbe8 in parse_bracket_exp dfa.c:1137
    #1 0x106e2eb34 in lex dfa.c:1523
    #2 0x106e30510 in dfaparse dfa.c:1943
    #3 0x106e3e24d in dfacomp dfa.c:3547
    #4 0x106e439ee in GEAcompile dfasearch.c:199
    #5 0x106e2499a in Gcompile grep.c:1648
    #6 0x106e27ca8 in main grep.c:2339

Introduced by commit v2.18-70-gd3d9612,
"dfa: simplify range char allocation".
---
 src/dfa.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/dfa.c b/src/dfa.c
index 5dc0f09..24b4d5c 100644
--- a/src/dfa.c
+++ b/src/dfa.c
@@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ parse_bracket_exp (void)
                      is wrong in multiple ways, it's never used in practice.
                      FIXME: Remove this (and related) unused code.  */
                   work_mbc->ranges
-                    = maybe_realloc (work_mbc->ranges, work_mbc->nranges + 1,
+                    = maybe_realloc (work_mbc->ranges, work_mbc->nranges + 2,
                                      &ranges_al, sizeof *work_mbc->ranges);
                   work_mbc->ranges[work_mbc->nranges].beg
                     = case_fold ? towlower (wc) : wc;
-- 
1.9.2.459.g68773ac

Reply via email to