Follow-up Comment #6, bug #57618 (project groff): Reconsidering the matter after reading Dave's comment #4, he is probably right that his arguments are stronger than those i brought forward, so i don't insist on keeping the PostScript column.
I don't think that the glyph list should be moved out of the groff_char(7) manual page, though. As i see it, the whole point of that manual page is providing that glyph list; the rest of the text in that page are merely explanatory notes on the glyph list that would hang in limbo if the list itself were moved elsewhere. Also, i'm not sure the grops(1) manual needs a list of glyph names. The grops(1) manual explains how the grops utility works *in general* and individual glyphs are somewhat tangential to that topic. Also, glyph naming appears to depend on the individual font (even though it seems everybody encourages using standard names for glyphs whenever possible). So maybe pointing to something like https://github.com/adobe-type-tools/agl-aglfn/blob/master/aglfn.txt moght be more useful than maintaining our own copy? I'm not sure, though. Also, this may be drifting off-topic from what this ticket is about. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57618> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
