Update of bug #57630 (project groff):
Status: None => Need Info
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #7:
It seems like we don't really have a consensus on this one yet.
Maybe we need an actual definition of what it is 'test-groff' is actually
supposed to do.
Ersatz user-local-packaging of the built groff tree as a runtime?
Ersatz isolated containerization of the built groff tree as a runtime?
These objectives are in tension.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57630>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
