Follow-up Comment #9, bug #55060 (project groff):
[comment #8 comment #8:]
> Can we treat this as a fresh bug? Its scope is much greater,
Yes, that was my intent with that sentence, for that very reason. Sorry if
that was unclear.
The committed change disregards the recommendation in comment #6 and continues
defining .xl and .ll in terms of environments (a troff concept meref.me
neither defines nor expects the user to know) rather than in terms of their
effects on the output. The explanation is at least correct now, but I'm
wondering what the rationale is for retaining that terminology.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55060>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
