Update of bug #61374 (project groff):
Status: None => Invalid
Assigned to: None => gbranden
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #3:
Dave's analysis is correct.
I'm closing this an invalid. If any groff options not already supported by
nroff are desired, please file a "Wish" severity ticket on Savannah
identifying which one(s) and articulating a plausible use case. (For example,
I believe the omission of `-e` and `-p` to have been deliberate, because
nroff-mode devices are generally not capable of coping adequately with the
output of the eqn and pic preprocessors. Also, `-e` already had a different
meaning in AT&T nroff.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61374>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
