Follow-up Comment #17, bug #62923 (project groff): Whilst you are correct the original submission matched the title, this was fixed in comment #1.All further comments then onwards are an entirely different issue which affects grops as well as gropdf. It seems odd to have an open ticket asigned to gropdf for a problem which has been fixed. The outstanding issue in the following comments concerns whether radicalex is a non-spacing character in the special font or not, in S it is, in XITSMR it is not (or vice-a-versa, I can't remember). The point is that eqn (or the definition in ps.tmac) only caters for the one case.
Since this ticket was originally closed when the problem to which the title refers was fixed, but you subsequently reopened when a different issue was reported in comment #2 I am unsure what to do. The original issue was definitely a gropdf problem since it was not seen if using grops, the second issue affected both grops and gropdf equally so is indicative that the problem is not with gropdf. What is your advice Branden? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62923> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/